Portraits assignment grading criteria
February 26, 2019 Leave a comment
Your Portraits assignment is due in your Google Drive folder before class on Monday (2/4). If you haven’t already started shooting, make sure you read over the assignment carefully: A3: Portraits/Light.
Your first two assignments were for credit, as long as you completed them and followed directions. Portraits will be your first graded assignment. We haven’t really discussed Joe Elbert’s Hierarchy since the second class, but you should re-read the handout or review the presentation, because it’s about setting standards for news photography. It’s something I use when grading assignments. As a quick reminder, here is the short version:
- Informational
- Graphic Appeal
- Emotional Appeal
- Intimate
While strictly informational photos can serve a purpose, our goal is to rise above these rudimentary types of photos. Photos with graphic appeal raise the bar by making your photos more interesting through composition and light. However, remember to set the bar at creating photos with emotional appeal. This is how we best create connections with our audience. And intimate photos are the ultimate goal. The very best news photos often exhibit all of these traits. The Portraits assignment is your first opportunity to start raising the bar with your images.
The following are some of the questions I will ask myself as I evaluate your photographs. I highlighted areas that relate to Elbert’s Hierarchy.
25%: Captions
- Have you written full sentences?
- Are there any typos in your caption? Spelling and grammar count!
- Have you followed AP Style to identify your subject? (The “Who” part of your caption, just like for the mugshots assignment.)
- Is it clear in your caption why this person might be newsworthy or interesting?
- Have you included at “sign-off” at the end of your caption in parentheses? (Your Name/MMJ3333)
- Is your caption embedded in the “description” field of your image file?
25%: Technical quality
- Is your photograph properly exposed? (Neither too dark nor too light)
- Is your subject sharp and in-focus? (NOTE: if you chose a shallow depth-of-field for your photograph, your subject still needs to be sharp and in-focus. HINT: typically focus on your subject’s eyes – especially for your close-up portrait)
- Is your color balance realistic?
25%: Use of Light
- Does one portrait exhibit soft light and the other hard light?
- Is it obvious, or do I have to guess which is which? (Study the characteristics of each type of light. It should be obvious!)
- Does the light help create a mood or atmosphere that is appropriate for your subject?
- Does the light create graphic appeal that draws interest to your subject through contrast and/or direction?
25%: Content
- Is one image an environmental portrait and the other a close-up featuring your subject’s face?
- Does your portrait exhibit the character, personality, or uniqueness of your subject (emotional appeal!)?
- Does your environmental portrait provide visual cues in order to better understand why your subject might be interesting or newsworthy (information!)?
- Does your portrait exhibit a level of intimacy between your subject and the viewer by revealing something personal or profound? Or by creating a sense of being right there, without the filtering presence of you, the photographer?
I will grade each portrait individually, so you will receive two grades, on a scale of 0-100, for this assignment. That way, if you excel at one and the other is not so great, you only need to re-shoot one, if you choose to do so.
Letter grades are as follows:
A (90%+) – Professional quality work. Technical execution, composition, content and captions meet professional standards.
B (80-89%) – Publishable. Competent technical quality and understandable, relevant content. Some correctable flaws.
C (70-79%) – Marginally publishable, but not desirable. Could have good content with technical problems. Could be technically fine, but lacking in journalistic value. A “record shot” which might be fine for social media, but not for professional news publications.
D (60-69%) – Not publishable. Poor technical quality and little-to-no journalistic value.
F (Below 60%) – Not acceptable. Major technical problems and no journalistic value. Missed deadline.
Remember this quote:
“A portrait is not made in the camera but on either side of it”
– Edward Steichen
A good portrait, or any good news photograph, starts with an interesting subject. And ends with your effort to tell his or her story.
Some of this criteria is specific to the Portraits assignment, but expect much of this (especially Joe Elbert’s Hierarchy) to be considerations for every shooting assignment you have for the rest of the semester.
Contact me if you have any questions.